From: "Hal Fox" <eemf@earthlink.net>
Subject: Current Plans for New Energy Device Options
Date: 20 Jan 2004

Dear Jean Hudon,

Here is the information that you requested:

DEVELOPMENT AND MARKETING OF A NEW ENERGY DEVICE

Emerging Energy Marketing Firm (EEMF), Inc. has been approved for a $40 million grant for the full-scale demonstration of the use of high-density, electron charge cluster technology for the on- site, stabilization of high-level, radioactive wastes. The process developed by EEMF is energy intensive, therefore, the grant funds include $10 million for the development and use of a new-energy device for providing the on-board, electrical energy required in the truck-trailer, demonstration unit.

EEMF, Inc. plans to raise sufficient funds for the further development, manufacturing, and marketing of a new-energy device that can produce electrical energy. It is planned to manufacture and sell such new-energy devices for initial use in the greenhouse industry. (It is anticipated that there may be some government restrictions for installing new-energy units in homes and offices until these devices are proven elsewhere.) In addition, EEMF has an electrical pick-up truck to use as the "hanger queen" for the development of on-the-vehicle battery chargers for electrical vehicles. (The term "hangar queen" comes from the aerospace industry where a unit is built and used for a variety of tests but may never fly.) New-energy units can be installed by the buyer, subject to any, as yet, unpublished national, state, or local restrictions.

There are two new-energy devices that are available to EEMF. One of these devices has several patents issued beginning with U.S. Patent 5,018,180. EEMF has been granted exclusive rights to these patents. A second device has been offered to EEMF provided that EEMF can show that the company has the financial capability to manufacture and market the device. The second device is also a non-moving part device and can be constructed somewhat like a printed circuit board.

One or both of these devices will be manufactured and marketed by EEMF as rapidly as practical. Currently, the lack of sufficient funds is holding up further development. However, grant funds have been approved and are expected to become available before the end of January, 2004. In addition, EEMF will file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to sell its shares to the public. Sufficient shares will be offered to provide the required manufacturing and marketing funds.

Another source of development funds will be from the sale of options for the first rights to purchase one or more of the new- energy devices as soon as they are available. Such a New Energy device will be initially manufactured in Utah (where much of the development work has begun and is expected to be completed). The cost of a new-energy device will be based on its size (the amount of electrical power that can be produced). For example, a one kilowatt unit would be suitable to be used as an on-the-vehicle battery charger for a stop-and-go family automobile. It would require a five kilowatt unit to keep the batteries charged for long-distant driving of a family car. All options funds will be used for new-energy device development.

EEMF is unsure, as yet, as to the optimum size of new-energy devices in the manufacturing stage. There will be a tradeoff of unit size and assemblies of smaller units. For example, the cost of producing a ten-kilowatt unit will be compared with the cost of producing and assembling ten, one-kilowatt units.

RISKS OF OPTION INVESTMENTS

While the decisson-makers of EEMF are confident in their eventual success, there is a risk in both the timing of the production of an acceptable new-energy device and the ultimate success of such a project. From the positive side, grant funds have been awarded and some of those funds will be used for further development work. On the negative side, the option investor must understand that there is, as yet, no definite proof that the development, manufacturing, and marketing of a new-energy device will be successfully concluded. There is a risk that some private or governmental actions may keep such a new-energy device from being manufactured or marketed. The option investor must understand that the option funds may be lost. NO GUARANTEE IS MADE TO THE OPTION PURCHASER EXCEPT FOR A BEST-EFFORTS APPROACH.

PRICE OF AN OPTION TO PURCHASE

The option to purchase one new-energy device having a power output of from one to five kilowatts (option-holder's choice) is $100. The $100 option payment will be subtracted from the price of the new-energy device. The planned price of a new-energy device is estimated at $250 per kilowatt. All option funds will be used for development work.

PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE

New energy devices will not be marketed until it is determined that the devices can be expected to last for at least two years without servicing or replacement. Servicing of these new-energy units will only be accomplished, initially, at the factory. Later, it will be expected that local distributors will be in place and will provide installation and maintenance services.

THE SOURCE OF THE ENERGY PRODUCED

The new-energy device is not dependent on sun, wind, tides, or any other "alternative energy" source. The new-energy devices to be further developed, manufactured, and marketed obtain their power from tapping space energy. Although not well known, there is an enormous amount of a special kind of energy that radiates throughout all space. It is known as space energy, Zero-Point Energy, and as ZPE. This is the energy that is responsible for the phenomena we call inertia. (When a body accelerates it picks up space energy and upon deceleration must give up that energy. That is why you wear seat belts. The phenomena is known as inertia and has only been understood during the last few years.)

CONTACT INFORMATION

Anyone who is interested in buying one or more options for a new-energy device should write to:

OPTIONS, EEMF, Inc.
3084 E. 3300 So.
Salt Lake City, UT 84109
USA

or send an email to eemf@earthlink.net

You may also use the PayPal system at https://www.paypal.com - the recipient of your payment must be - or mail a Postal Money Order or cash if you cannot draw a check on a U.S. or Canadian bank. Payments must be made to Emerging Energy Marketing Firm (EEMF), Inc.

For all money sent, a numbered option certificate will be sent by email or by postal mail.

Qualified distributors may also write for further information.




Date: 21 Jan 2004
To: "Hal Fox" <eemf@earthlink.net>
From: Jean Hudon <globalvisionary@earthrainbownetwork.com>
Subject: Re: Current Plans for New Energy Device Options

Dear Hal

Thanks a lot once again for your quick reply.

Now please bear with me here ;-)

I'd like you to please give me a bit more explanation as to the exact cost as compared to my current utility cost.

Currently I use on average 40 KWh per day for my whole house (which is partly electrically heated) and it costs me about $2.75 per day.

Since I'm not familiar with these things, I'd like to know how a one-kilowatt unit (that should cost around $250 and to last at least 2 years) produces compared with what I need and a cost comparison would seem necessary as well. Would I need 40 one-kilowatt units to fulfill all my daily needs (this is an average - in some cold days it is certainly much more while in summertime it is very little)? It would cost me $10,000.00 for 40 units while it currently costs me about a thousand dollars per year. If I'm correct then this does not look like an attractive deal. And if I were to buy a 1-kw unit or perhaps a 5Kw unit (and would it be 5 kw per hour?) what use could I have for this? I suppose it could power some light in a cottage. or perhaps replace a deep charge battery to power an electric motor for a boat. Would it be direct current or alternating current? Would I need more gizmos to adapt it to work for various appliances? What will be the voltage output: 12 Volts of 110 volts or 220 volts? Adjustable? And what about the amps?

I'm quite sure other people will have similar questions and if the deal appears to be unreasonably unfavorable as compared to other existing sources of electricity, then I doubt many people will buy it - give a downpayment. Ideally it would be great to have an approximate cost of one kilowatt/hour. Here in Quebec the basic rate is about 4.5 cents for one KWH - which is quite cheap as compared to most other places on Earth, granted - plus a daily fixed rate for being connected to the grid (about $1) plus taxes. Of course I guess it all depends on how many years a unit will last without major repairs - if repairs will be available only at your factory, then the shipping cost to the US from Canada plus the custom duties each time could make repairs prohibitively too expensive, especially if each unit is heavy. Only two years seems fairly short to me... Are there many moving parts in these devices? Could you provide spare parts with easy-to-follow instructions so we may fix it ourselves?

I'm curious to see if you have considered all these aspects already...

Sorry to bring all those things up, but these seems like important info to provide - at the best of your knowledge, which is probably limited still much remains to be developed.

I'm curious to know also: why would the initial use be in the greenhouse industry first?

CLIP

Best regards

Jean




From: "Hal Fox" <eemf@earthlink.net>
Subject: Cost of electrical energy
Date: 21 Jan 2004

Dear Jean Hudon,

You have brought up some good points that will be carefully considered by most buyers. The real key point is that most people would not recognize the difference between kilowatts and kilowatt hours. The following kind of information will be required to teach people about the devices.

You have given me some good ideas. Instead of rating our units in kilowatts, it might be less confusing to rate the units is kilowatt hours per day. We engineers and scientists have our own gobbydegook. That is why we need marketing specialists to get the message properly stated for ease in understanding by the consumer.

For example, a marketing person might say: Think about having a $1,000 new-energy device that provides all the electrical power needed to operate your home and save you $5 a day in electrical bills. Most buyers would be able to divide $1,000 by $5 and discover that the cost would be repaid in 200 days.

Here is the kind of explanation that may help:

COST OF NEW ENERGY DEVICES.

The New-Energy devices that we will be manufacturing and marketing have no moving parts. The construction is something like a printed circuit board.

Various sizes of devices are rated according to their ability to provide electrical power. Sizes will probably (initially) range from 1 to 10 Kilowatts (meaning that a device will put out 1 to 10 kilowatts each hour all day long (24 to 240 kilowatt hours per day). Like computer electronic boards, the normal guarantee will probably be for two years operation. However, they will be repairable and will be expected to last for several years.

The cost of electrical power ranges from about 5 cents per kilowatt hour to more than 10 cent per KWhr depending on what part of the country you are in. Unless a home is electrically heated, a normal 10 KW unit would provide for all the electrical needs. However, there may have to be some adjustments in the way energy is consumed, for example, turn off the TVs while cooking dinner on the electric stove.

Assume that you purchased a 10 KW unit for $250. Assume that you used an average of 3 KW per hour (say 75 KWhr per day). Then the 10 KW unit would provide from $3.75 to $7.50 (5 to 10 cents per KWhr) worth of electrical energy per day. Then it would take about 67 or 33 days to recover the costs of the $250 unit.

We are not sure of the manufacturing costs of the 10 KW unit. But even at $1,000 per unit, the cost recovery time would be from 267 days to 133 days to recover the cost of the $1,000 unit from the electricity cost savings from the power company.

Currently, very complicated computers can be puchased for as little as $1,000. Therefore, it is a pretty good assumption that these new-energy devices can be manufactured and marketed at a price that will save the buyers considerable money on their electrical bills.

There will be units that will produce either alternating or direct current and at various voltages depending on their application. For the electric vehicle industry, one might be providing 80 to 90 volts d.c. to charge four or five storage batteries. Some homes will want to have 230 volts a.c. and some will want to have 115 volt a.c. The amperage rating is a function of amperes equal watts divided by volts. A 10 KW unit producing 115 volts would have an amperage rating of about 87 amperes. These are easy conditions to provide, as long as one has an electricity producing device.

The concept (for the United States) is that the first installations might be for use in greenhouses for lights and heating. The reason is that there may be sufficient resistance from some energy companies to lobby the government not to allow the units in homes and offices until proven to be safe. For a power company to take this stand would be ridiculous, but then we deal with the ridiculous daily. A power company that needs more power to serve its customers would be wise to buy and install the new-energy units in homes at the farthest reaches of its power lines and gradually dismantle the power lines. Power generation (especially by the burning of natural gas now in short supply) or by the burning of oil (also becoming depleted world wide) is expensive. Power generation by burning of coal will become increasingly expensive as the requirments for clean burning become more strict.

*** End of Power-Cost Discussion ***

Our plan is to become affiliated with sufficient large organizations so that we are not just a new little company than can be squashed by those who do not want any changes made to energy production and distribution.

In 1876 a Western Union internal memo stated "The telephone has too many shortcoming to be seriously considered for communications. The device is inherently of no value to us."

The size of the fossil fuel market is about $4 trillion per year. It will take ten years and billions of dollars to penetrate that market world-wide by 10 percent. (We have written a paper showing the rate and costs of market penetration.)

Just for your information, I have both an MBA as well as a Ph.D. in science. Therefore, I am qualified to help guide our company to make a successful business.

Our company is becoming known for its work in the on-site stabilization of high-level, radioactive liquids and solids. That way we are not deemed to be a threat to any of the current energy companies. By the time we are marketing energy products, we expect to have the affiliations and the political clout to fend off any who look upon us as energy competitors.

Thank you for the information about some of the companies that might have an interest in funding or becoming affiliated with our company. I'll make some contacts.

Keep up the good work. The world needs more people like you.

Best personal regards,

Hal Fox, Pres. EEMF, Inc.




IN AN ADDITIONAL CORRESPONDENCE HAL ALSO WROTE:

- We will accept option funds from anywhere in the world. We haves already established contacts in several countries where the product will be also manufactured, marketed, and serviced. Those who want to have options will be doing a big favor to us to show what part of the world will be ready for a local manufacturer.

- There have been previous instances where new-energy devices have been bought up and shelved and even some cases where small, independent inventors had their labs or shops destroyed or were informed that they were not to do any further work. One of the clever methods has been used by the U.S. Patent Office: When the patent application is received, it is classified SECRET and the inventor told that he could not do any further disclosure without permission from the federal government.

As soon as we receive our first funds for the demonstration of the on-site stabilization of high-level, radioactive wastes, I will produce a media letter and send you a copy.




NOTE: HERE IS THE MATERIAL INITIALLY INCLUDED IN THE The Arisen Phoenix Series #2: Major Hope On The Horizon

NOTE FROM JEAN: I've known Hal Fox for more than 5 years now and he has been a consistent and most credible source of validation of all new energy developments. Those of you who have been long enough on this list will remember his regular feedbacks I posted after requesting his input on various new energy development info I had received - read for instance http://www.earthrainbownetwork.com/MiracleinVoid.htm">Miracle in the Void: The New Energy Revolution (March 13, 2000) or check http://search.freefind.com/find.html?id=1754375&pid=r&mode=ALL&query=new+energy&t=s. There could be no way to emphasize emphatically enough the need to support this man and what he is doing right now. Much of the future on this planet hinges on us and the rest of the world rallying in support of these new energy producing technologies that will gradually free us from the yoke of fossil fuels and the ecosuicidal consequences of their unrelenting use. Please contact Hal directly if you are willing to assist or - as I suggested to him - mail him a downpayment to make sure you'll get your own new-energy device as soon as it becomes available. I'm sure having this option will appeal to thousands of supporters interested to invest in their own future energy security. More details on this below.

Date: 16 January 2004
From: Hal Fox <eemf@earthlink.net>

SUBJECT: NEW ENERGY SOURCES

There are dramatic developments being made in new-energy systems.

Definition: New-energy does not include the older forms of "alternative energy" with sources from sun, wind, tide, geothermal, or biomass. Also not included are fuel cells and the use of hydrogen. Fuel cells are a hundred-year-old technology. The production of hydrogen from water is energy intensive.

Creating energy from the burning of fossil fuels creates a market that is approximately $4.5 trillion per year. [Source of data from Encyclopaedia Britannica Book of the Year 2000, computed at 5 cents per kilowatt hour.] The result of fossil fuel combustion is global warming and the pollution of our atmosphere. These valuable fossil-fuel resources should be retained for continued long-term use as chemical feed stocks.

Our group has spent over 14 years searching the world for new-energy devices. There are now five new-energy devices that have been invented, tested, and which are in some stage of being commercialized and are considered to have strong commercial potential. 

All five new-energy devices are patented (or have patents pending) and all five appear to pass our stringent requirements as follows:

1. The device must provide three times as much energy output as the energy input by the operator (the excess energy is input freely or nearly freely by the active environment). [Thermal energy is about one-third the cost of electrical energy and some devices use electrical input which produces thermal energy output.]

2. The source of the extra energy must have a scientific basis.

3. The devices must be non-polluting, tap a large energy source, and be able to be economically manufactured, in other words, have a strong commercial potential.

The following is a list of viable new-energy devices that are judged to have near-term, strong, commercial potential:

1. Devices based on high-density, electron charge clusters (six patents issued). For example, see U.S. Patent 5,018,180. Note: this is the first patent, known to us, to state that the excess energy comes from tapping the zero-point vacuum energy of space. This discovery appears to be a major candidate for providing our future energy needs. The Utah group (Emerging Energy Marketing Firm, Inc., EEMF) has the exclusive rights to all six patents that have issued in the U.S. I am president of EEMF, Inc.

2. Dr. Randell Mills patented discovery of energy from water (from the hydrogen in water). See http://www.blacklightpower.com. The source of this energy is a new form of chemical energy from "collapsing the hydrogen atom below its normal ground state."

3. The Russian patented process for a low-energy nuclear reactor. Reportedly, two kilowatts of electrical input provides forty kilowatts of thermal energy. The source of this energy is from relatively safe, low-energy, nuclear reactions. This device uses a piezo-electric crystal to vibrate a mixture of light and heavy water. The surging water is moved back and forth through small holes in a special material resulting in a development of high voltage resulting in considerable thermal energy.

4. Tom Bearden (and co-inventors) stationary electromagnetic generator (one patent issued others pending). This device apparently is also tapping the energy of space. Independent testing is currently underway.

The fifth device is under a non-disclosure agreement, however, the inventor is negotiating with a U.S. company to produce and distribute this new-energy device in the United States. It is expected that this new-energy device (which also gets its energy from tapping the energy of space) will be ready for marketing in 2004.

It is past time for governments (state and national) and, more important, private industry, to recognize that solutions to the current polluting, high-cost, energy sources are available. Development funds have been provided from corporate and private investors. No U.S. government funds have been used in developing these new-energy devices. Furthermore, there is no need for tax- payers funds to be used.

Any one of the above new-energy discoveries can be commercialized within two years with an estimated $15 million or less. To build a new fossil-fuel-powered, atmospheric-polluting, electrical generating plant will take at least three years and cost $100 million or more.

EEMF is being privately funded for a project to demonstrate that radioactive solids can be transmuted to stable elements with a dramatic reduction in radioactivity. EEMF, Inc. has demonstrated the capability to dramatically reduce radioactivity from radioactive liquids. (Paper presented at a meeting of the American Nuclear Society).

Forgive the following ad, but thought you would like to know: [Some choose to keep up with these developments by a $35 per year Membership in the Institute of New Energy and receive New Energy News by email each month. Also, some subscribe to the peer- reviewed Journal of New Energy for $150 per year (which also includes emailed copies of New Energy News).]

Submitted by Hal Fox, Editor, J. of New Energy 3084 E. 3300 S. Salt Lake City, UT 84109 Phone 801-466-8680 Fax 801-466-8668

*****

The above is a standard blurb telling people like yourself that there are answers to lifeaftertheoilcrash. However, the situation is getting desperate because it will take about ten years of intensive manufacturing and marketing to penetrate just 10 percent of the fossil-fuel market. And this penetration will be resisted by Bush and his cohorts who are well funded by the fossil fuel (especially coal) industries.

Best personal regards,

Hal Fox, president, EEMF, Inc.

P.S. EEMF has been approved for a large grant (up to $40 million) for the on-site stabilization of high-level, radioactive liquid wastes. $10 million of this amount is for the needed new-energy device development. Those who desire to purchase new-energy devices to provide electricity for their home or office can be first in line by paying a modest $100 US per option. For more information email Hal Fox at

NOTE FROM JEAN: I required much more information from Hal and have been thoroughly satisfied with his replies. I will mail him my $100 shortly. Should you want to review the additional information he would email you, my questions and his replies, please go at http://www.EarthRainbowNetwork.com/Archives2004/HalFox.htm - this way you'll save Hal some time which he may better focus of his company and the final development of his amazing new energy products. Should you have additional questions that are not answered in my correspondence with him, I'm sure he will be pleased to answer you. Please copy me on your questions and his replies so I may include these additional details to the current webpage on this topic.




Note from Jean: Before networking this above, I circulated it to a small list of people and got a feedback from Tom Bearden (who is mentioned above) who suggested some minor yet necessary corrections (now included above) and had the following important comments:

From: "Tom Bearden" <soliton@bellsouth.net>
Subject: RE: Here is the intro note that will go with your update
Date: 18 Jan 2004

Hal, Jean and all,

(...) The article is very timely, particularly when one considers the giant emerging Chinese thirst for more energy. Some analysts estimate the Chinese demand will double in just a few years, by as early as 2010, but certainly by 2015. The Hubbert peak has already occurred, and the availability of cheap oil is declining. All modern national economies are based on cheap energy (and one would hope, cheap CLEAN energy which presently is not the case. So the world is looking at a very bleak future, with energy wars erupting, failures in agriculture (because of escalating energy costs etc.), and massive turning to dirty energy such as from coal plants. Presently our scientific community particularly the Department of Energy -- has released its major program needs, and its for hot fusion, big accelerators, and more of the same. The technologies pointed out by Hal are capable of being developed to alleviate the coming great energy crisis (convulsion is more like it). Anything that can be done to get that message out to the public, is well worthwhile. And Hal is one of the inspirations and stalwarts in this entire field, who has exerted great effort for many years now, largely paid for out of his own pocket. Just wanted to touch up that little point that needs correcting, and express my personal admiration and support of Hal Fox. Best wishes,

Tom Bearden



P.S. from Jean: To find out more about Tom Bearden, the Motionless Electromagnetic Generator he co-designed, and tons of other fascinating scientific information go at http://www.cheniere.org/ and for much more check also at http://www.google.ca/search?q=Tom+Bearden&ie=ISO-8859-1&hl=en&btnG=Google+Search&meta=






THE FOLLOWING IS TAKEN FROM Fraser Clark <fraser@parallel-youniversity.com> Jan 21 NEWSLETTER #182

THE COMING ENERGY REVOLUTION...

...is the title of a book written by Canadian journalist Jeane Manning (U.S.A. Avery Publishing ISBN 0-89529-713-2) in which she examines the brilliant new clean safe and inexhaustible technologies that are now becoming available.

A number of scientists have been carrying out research in these fields for a good many years - some of the principles have been known throughout this century and earlier, the pioneering work of the physicist Nicolai Tesla is a case in point.

However, powerful vested interests in the fossil fuel and electricity generating industries have ensured Tesla's work has been largely forgotten. Subsequent research by a small number of scientists has been carried out very much on their own, out of sight in back yards and garages etc. and without disclosing to their colleagues and faculties that they are doing it. When they have gone public, they have often been ridiculed and ostracised. They can lose their posts or have their research papers and equipment seized by government agencies as has happened on a number of occasions in the U.S.

Part of the problem has been the attitude of the scientific establishment many of whom continue to deny the possibilities because some of the principles involved are not yet fully understood by mainstream science.

What are these new technologies?

COLD NUCLEAR FUSION

Nuclear power was revolutionary because it represented a break from the ancient technology of burning things to produce energy, but it proved to be so dangerous in it's present form that people understandably say it must go.

However COLD nuclear fusion (as opposed to hot fusion) may have the potential to be the safe simple and inexpensive application of nuclear technology, but the success of experiments in this area has been denied and suppressed for 10 years or more.

"SPACE" or "ZERO POINT" ENERGY

This is the most radical and far reaching technology with the potential to institute a revolution that would dramatically change our landscape our environment our economies and our whole lives for the better. It's based on the new physics that recognises that everything in the cosmos is ultimately made up of energy, including what we perceive to be solid matter, which is not solid at all when analysed at the sub-atomic level. It also includes what appears to be "empty" space which may not be empty at all, but rather filled with a universal energy field which somehow holds everything in place - the atoms and molecules in "matter", the sun and planets etc. in the solar system and so on. It is sometimes referred to as the "zero point energy field" because devices, some of them solid state (i.e. with no moving parts) are being developed that can tap into this universal field of energy and provide electric power. Some may need a conventional power input to get them started but, once up and running, they can continue without any further conventional input.

The implications of the successful application of this technology are enormous - the end of the electricity grid system, as homes, offices, factories etc. have their own electricity supplying devices installed on the premises. Clean unlimited electric power in cars etc. replacing the internal combustion engine. Solar, wind and wave power would then be seen as expensive, inadequate and obsolete, and the oil industry would be decimated.

Funding for further research and development is urgently required given this, the scientists involved in this technology are confident that marketable products could be available within 10 years. Do not doubt how rapid technological progress can be with proper funding - just study the fantastic progress made in computer and communications technology in the last 20 years.

Vested interests are preventing the same sort of progress being made with space energy technology, because the implications are so great. If we are to live in a technologically advanced, better, pollution free world there may ultimately be no choice but to embrace the new technologies and all the changes that will go with them.

Richard Greaves / Herefordshire, UK.

MORE DETAILS ON THIS BOOK AT
http://www.google.ca/search?q=THE+COMING+ENERGY+REVOLUTION+Jeane+Manning&ie=ISO-8859-1&hl=en&btnG=Google+Search&meta

HAL FOX HAD THE FOLLOWING COMMENT ON THIS BOOK REVIEW ABOVE...

My friend, Jeane Manning has the correct idea: Tap the vast energy of space itself (all space, everywhere, even inside of us). In fact it is because space energy is both inside and outside of our bodies that we do not "feel" this enormous energy - there is no energy gradient to "feel." However, space energy can be "felt" because it is the cause for inertia. Get in your car, fasten your seat belt, accerate to 50 mph and slam on the brakes. You are thrown forward in your seat. We have labeled this effect as inertia but only recently have understood the source. When a mass accelerates it pick up space energy. When a moving mass decelerates it loses space energy. That is how we can "feel" space energy.

There is enough space energy in a liter volume (or quart) that if it could be turned into thermal energy you could boil the Atlantic Ocean.

Some new-energy devices (at least two of them) tap this space energy and convert it to electrical (and some thermal) energy. That is what we are developing and will make available to the world as rapidly as funds are available.



SUBSCRIPTION TO THE EARTH RAINBOW NETWORK E-LIST

If you would like to subscribe to the Earth Rainbow Network automated listserver and regularly receive compilations covering a broad range of subjects, including each new Meditation Focus issued every two week, simply send a blank email at earthrainbownetwork-subscribe@lists.riseup.net from the email account to which you want to receive the material compiled and networked by the Earth Rainbow Network Coordinator. Subscription is FREE!





BACK TO THE FIRST HOME PAGE OF THIS SITE